Get out because curves come and, According to the digital education Council, 86% of university students already use an AI tool to do jobs, solve exercises or, directly, copy answers. The phenomenon is not exclusive to the University: in institutes and schools, Chatgpt and other AI have become the ‘plan B’ of thousands of students to get out of the way in any task.
While it is true that all this began as a tool to search for information or solve specific doubts, it has now become the best friend of many students when doing jobs, preparing exams or even writing complete topics.
The problem is that many teachers have already lost patience. After detecting jobs full of errors, invented appointments and phrases that do not sound to any teenager, they have decided to stop playing ‘good poli’.
Now, some teachers warn: if the student uses ia to write, they will use AI to correct. «You do not write it, I do not read it,» they warn, and in some cases even ask students to confess if they have resorted to technology before delivering the work.
To copy with the correct with ia
All this tiredness has weight reasons and, in the United States, a Federal Court has proved the reason to teachers who suspended two students for delivering a work done entirely with AI, full of false quotes and erroneous data. Justice sentenced that the punishment was fair, although the school regulation did not explicitly prohibit the use of AI.
For example, we already cover in Computer today A case in Vigo, in which a teacher told that her students ask her the following: «Why do you tell me if everything is fine?» They refer to the use of AI to do the jobs, but she realizes, since notes that they are not expressed the same in class. Even some students used programs to detect if their work has plagiarism before delivering it.
In another institute, and as they add from the Lighthouse of Vigo, teachers have noticed that students use words that are not normal in them. Going beyond, in professional training, a teacher even suspended some students for using Chatgpt to do their jobs. The AI detected that everything was copied and had no choice.
This is why More and more teachers are using artificial intelligence to correct jobs, customize exercises or even detect plagiarism. But all this goes further, and some teachers have decided that, if students do not try, they will not.
Of course, here add a small data and that is, very careful because the results of leaving everything in the hands of AI are not exactly the best.
A study by the University of Georgia showed that language models only hit 33% of corrections if they are not given a human guide, and they barely reach 50% even with a clear criterion. That is to say, AI can be fast, but does not replace the understanding and judgment of a flesh and bone teacher.
A situation with AI in the classrooms that brings to many teachers
With all this, How can students be checked with AI? How can IA be used to improve learning?
He quid From the matter it seems that it is not «in favor or against chatgpt» but focuses on «how far this tool should be used to help students.»
To solve this problem, Those who are in favor of controlled use think that universities should implement strategies such as promoting academic ethics through training programsdesign custom tasks that require a critical and specialized analysis and use plagiarism detection tools to identify the improper use of this OpenAi chatbot or many others.
In addition, oral evaluation or defense of work and promoting that interaction between teachers and students can be a good point to take into account. If the work has done it in 100% Chatgpt, it is quite likely that you are left blank in front of the court and its questions.