«Bitcoin has nothing to do with Michael Saylor»

In a recent publication in social networks, Margot Paez, developer and member of Bitcoin Policy Institute, a non -profit organization that investigates Bitcoin’s political and social implications and emerging monetary networks, expressed his position on the relationship between Bitcoin (BTC) and Michael Saylor, Strachegy leader, rejecting the idea that the asset owes relevance to the billionaire.

«Bitcoin has nothing to do with Michael Saylor. Michael Saylor is just a very rich narcissist who learned about Bitcoin like anyone else, ”said Paez. According to the specialist, The attention that Saylor receives reflects, in an undeserved way, how society values ​​those who reach high executive positions and accumulate wealth.

In this way, Paez emphasizes that Bitcoin was created by an anonymous programmer, known as Satoshi Nakamoto, and that his launch was performed discreetly and humble, through an mail list on cryptography.

For criticism, The true relevance of the asset lies in its technological design and in those who develop itmore than in the public figures that promote it.

«Worship the nerds that develop the tools if they feel the need to worship someone. They are the ones that make Bitcoin work, ”wrote the developer.

Paez also remembers that, in essence, Bitcoin is money: a safe protocol, a decentralized global network and an asset without a issuer that functions as commodity. Its value and utility do not depend on any tycoon nor of the media care you can receive. For this reason, the specialist recommends saving, spending and using BTC for their own merits, without being influenced by any public figure.

Beyond the message, the truth is that Saylor’s role cannot be denied in the dissemination of Bitcoin’s principles. Strategy, the company that the millionaire founded and quotes on the stock market, currently has 632,457 BTC, according to Bitcoin Treasuries data. With this, it remains the public firm with the largest reservation of the digital currency in the world.

So, The businessman has established himself as one of Bitcoin’s main defenders as a financial assetits ethical and decentralized nature, and its potential as a reserve of long -term wealth.

Last March, during the digital Asset Summit in New York, Saylor shared his perspectives on the creation of Satoshi. As Cryptonotic reports reported, he stressed the durability and uniqueness of Bitcoin, stating that the digital currency is not simply a passenger technological update, but a perfect creation arising from imperfect components.

«Bitcoin’s true beauty lies in the elegance of his protocol. With him you buy one of the 21 million parts of all his money in the world, ”said Saylor.

In addition, the millionaire said Bitcoin represents a system of thought that promotes individual freedom, innovation and private property in front of the state agency.

Saylor contributed to more bitcoiners, respond in the community

After publishing his comments on the relationship between Bitcoin and Saylor, Paez received various community responses, which generated an exchange of ideas about technology, history and social responsibility. Some took advantage of the conversation to discuss their history and evolution.

One of them highlighted the importance of recognizing the Cypherpunks and who contributed later to the development of the currency, even without having invented it: «The best artists in history did not need to invent the brush, the best musicians did not invent the instruments, and some of the best bitcoiners did not invent Bitcoin. It is an evolution, and the way of using existing tools also contributes to the path ».

Another participant said that, as much as Saylor is qualified as «wealthy narcissistic», His role allowed people without technical knowledge to get involved in Bitcoinand for that reason he was grateful.

These exchanges show that the Bitcoin debate continues focused on its technological evolution, its accessibility and the participation of those who make it work, either as developers or users, regardless of the media power of some figures.