Meta ia has finally arrived in Spain for the messaging app, Instagram and Facebook. Apparently, he plans to compete with Microsoft Copilot, Google Gemini and other chatbots, with the support of the millions of users who use the day -to -day application.
However, there are rivals that are much more powerful and who, previously, have been implemented on the green platform. For example, it is possible to integrate chatgpt in WhatsApp and also There is the Alternative of Lightia that was one of the first to arrive.
Whether you use iPhone, as if you have an Android, You should be able to see the blue circle and access the conversation. In itself, it is a great novelty, but is it really as powerful as it is said? It is time to get out of doubt, this artificial intelligence must be tested by comparing it with the other options mentioned.
Goal Ia has a higher speed, but less reasoning
Hob
One of the main things that determine the reliability of artificial intelligence is undoubtedly speed and reasoning. Among all this must be highlighted that Goal Ia takes the throne in speed and processing.
Instead of showing a «writing» as a waiting mode, whatsapp, gradually reveals how the answer is generated, Something similar to what Deepseek does. In addition, it does so in a slightly lower time in its closest alternatives.
However, you cannot have everything in life and it is that when it comes to reasoning in the face of logical capacity, there are many things to clarify. For several Argument tests with very strange promptsit can be confused and there is more likely hallucinations.
It should be noted that it seems to happen in very specific chaos and is not common, but when it comes to comparing, it is a negative point when it is before others that incorporate greater natural and logical language.
It lacks functions that Chatgpt and Luzia do have
In itself it is an excellent chatbot, until you start seeing the things that are missing and that is not only one. For example, In Chatgpt and Luzia you have the ability to send a voice note and answer you after analyzing it.
Unfortunately, goal does not incorporate that functionality, leaving a feature that could be very exploited, especially because it is one of the most representative things of the message platform.
Another of the things that You can’t do is receive images and check themthat is, grant information about what he sees, when it is equally relevant as audio reading.
Something that could have differentiated from others is that it incorporated the option to identify files such as PDF to analyze the textgive summaries or other actions, but cannot do it. None of the aforementioned have achieved it so far (in the link with WhatsApp).
Of course, when it comes to generating images, it is a characteristic that will arrive soon to the goal AI And that is where I could stand out above all if it manages to offer high quality results. On the official website, they have already shared some tests and when I arrive in Spain it could be an incredible leap.
Internet search makes it a good option
WhatsApp/Flaticon
There is not much Difference with others when it comes to analyzing texts or content generationbut when it comes to concrete internet search things, it is a very good option.
While the OpenAi tool is superior, goal is not far behind. If appropriate prompts are used, sources support capacity should not give you problems. The same way, Ask you to validate your answers with true information It doesn’t hurt.
The links that grant go according to the questions made and are of high quality, so it could be said that it is what is most attracted. This is a good option to save the fact of leaving the app to go to Google and use the search engine, since you can trust it to Verify the sources from which the information comes out.
Is it worth using a goal before Openai’s AI?
Meta
In itself, the goal is a good choice because it offers reliable research and the good information is that You don’t have to do additional processes to integrate itsince it is natively in WhatsApp.
However, if what you are looking for is an advanced artificial intelligence, you need to know that it is not the best option. At the moment, Chatgpt and Luzia are more complete in terms of reasoning and characteristicsalthough they are only one step further.
Over time, It is expected to make the way and become a more stable platform Compared to others, one that will probably give them a lot of competition. In fact, there are many things that have been confirmed by the company and in the future there will be interesting news for this proposal, because they are not currently available.
Similarly, this is the decision of each user, Compare it with alternatives like CopilotGemini, Grok and othersis valid to know if it adapts to what you need. If you feel comfortable with her, then there is nothing more to discuss, after all comfort is the main thing. For now, we just have to wait for it to evolve to see it in its maximum splendor.
Know How we work in NoticiasVE.
Tags: Artificial Intelligence, Application, Opinion, WhatsApp