New theory points to Jack DORSEY as Satoshi Nakamoto

Foto del autor

By Berto R

In the midst of new speculations about the identity of Satoshi Nakamoto, the Bitcoin creator pseudonym, there are data that relate to Jack DORSEY with the enigmatic figure.

This is suggested in X Sean Murray, president and editor in chief of the Debanked Financial News Website; whose investigation was supported by Matthew Sigel, head of investigation of the Vaneck investments firm.

In the opinion of both there is a large list of facts, numbers and dates related to Bitcoin that also They are connected with the Twitter co -founder (now X) and Executive Director of Square.

The evidence that links Jack with Satoshi is a combination of technical parallels, circumstantial links, patterns (including time), amazing coincidences, motives and capacity.

Matthew Sigel.

He adds that, although it is not definitive evidence, the amplitude of the connections is convincing and deserves greater scrutiny.

Among the data mentioned in Murray’s investigation, the first Bitcoin transaction is related to DORSEY MOTHER’S BIRTHDAYon January 11. While the last bloc minted by Satoshi supposedly occurred on his father’s birthday, on March 5, 2010.

Murray adds that Satoshi allegedly registered at the Bitcoin forum on Dorsy’s birthday, November 19. This, while all documents of the original Bitcoin source code have an exact time at 4 am (without time zone), an hour that DORSEY HAD ON YOUR TWITTER PROFILE.

It is also said that Satoshi used «brute force» to create Bitcoin addresses, including one that begins with «JD2M», which Murray means «Jack DORSEY 2 MINT», referring to the old residence of DORSEY in 2 mint place in San Francisco.

To this adds that the email «GMX» of Satoshi was hacked on September 8, 2014. Apparently, the hacker tried to extort Satoshi, sharing that he knew about Your connection with St. LouisMissouri, the city where Dorsy was born and grew.

Murray states that Satoshi also logged in «accidentally» on the Internet Relay Chat on January 10, 2009, with a real IP address based in California, where had its Twitter headquarters and where Dorsy spent much of his time.

Taking all these correlations into account, Sigel claims to be «personally convinced» that Jack Dorsy is Satoshi. «This is my opinion, not that of Vaneck,» he insists, commenting that he does not believe that making public this suspicion can harm Bitcoin or his community.

«Even if Jack still has 5.2% of the BTC supply, the decentralized design of the protocol guarantees that it remains out of the control of any individual,» he said.

So far, there is no pronouncement of Dorsey on this subject. Although in 2020 Jack denied being Satoshi Nakamoto in an interview with the computer scientist Lex Fridman, stating: «No, and if it were, would I tell you?»

Despite this, Murray and Sigel insist on pointing it out, saying that Dorsy He showed Cypherpunk trends Since 1996, while studying computer science at the University.

But, despite the coincidences shown, the users of X They expressed their skepticism. They are difficult for Satoshi, a creator of moneyless money, then censoring information, as Dorsy did on Twitter.

Others raised doubts about whether Satoshi would wear a shirt with the “Satoshi” legend in public, much less in the Super Bowl, as Dorsey did in 2024.

Despite being in anonymity, which was one of Satoshi’s wishes when he disappeared from the public scene in 2010, the two experts consider that knowing their identity could reduce «unnecessary uncertainty.»

They think it is important to address market fears around 1.1 million BTC that satoshi has. However, nothing seems to point to that The identity of the computer scientist can be known.

Satoshi Nakamoto BTC could be in danger against quantum. Source: Ia Grok.

As cryptootics pointed out, during all these years speculations about the identity of Nakamoto have put their eyes on many figures of the ecosystem.

The most recent suspect is Peter Todd, whom an HBO documentary pointed out as the creator of Bitcoin, a theory that also was rejected by experts of the industry.

Deja un comentario